IFRIC decision on how leasehold improvements affect lease term assessment under MFRS 16
The IFRS Interpretations Committee had in its last meeting of the decade concluded that the enforceable period of a lease under IFRS 16 reflects broader economics, not just legal rights and termination cash payments.
If an entity expects to use non-removable leasehold improvements beyond the date on which the lease contract can be terminated, the existence of those leasehold improvements indicates that the entity might incur more than an insignificant penalty if it terminates the lease. Consequently, an entity considers whether the contract is enforceable for at least the period of expected utility of the leasehold improvements.
Using a broader interpretation of penalty, some leases will have a longer enforceable period. If there are longer enforceable periods and the lessee is reasonably certain to continue using the asset, it will result in a longer lease term and therefore larger lease liabilities for the lessee. Read more